Can Pro-Life Democrats be Significant?
For some pro-life Dems, their platform seems to be that, if elected, they won't be in a position to do much on the pro-life front anyway. John McColgan, running for Congressman in Oregon, feels it's important to point out that:
Before I go further, it is important to note that I am not seeking a seat on the Supreme Court. I am not running for president, and we all know that a president appoints Supreme Court justices. I am not even running for the U.S. Senate, where Supreme Court nominees have to be confirmed before they can serve on the high court. I am running for a seat in the U.S. House of Representatives, and although members of the House do vote on matters pertaining to abortion, they are not likely to have a role in upholding or overturning Roe vs. Wade. So what I am saying is really an expression of a philosophical stance on the issue.
In other words "I'm pro-life, but don't worry because I'm not going to do anything about it." Mind you, this beats the positiions of John Kerry, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, Jessie Jackson, and Dennis Kucinich, whose position might be characterized as "I'm pro-life, except when I'm running for President."
Is the Democratic Pary's pro-choice stance its undoing? Conservative Columnist Larry Eastland has suggested that not for abortion, the Democrats would have carried the 2000 election.

